Best Coda Alternatives 2026: Top Tools for Docs, Databases & Collaboration

Coda has built a solid reputation as an all-in-one workspace that mixes documents, databases, and lightweight apps into a single platform. But here's the thing: it doesn't work for everyone. The complexity can be overwhelming, performance tanks as documents grow, the pricing model leaves people scratching their heads, and the mobile app? Users call it "essentially unusable." You might have run into those document size limits on the free tier, dealt with lag that makes real-time note-taking a chore, or watched team members avoid the platform because the learning curve feels too steep.

Then there's the December 2024 Grammarly acquisition and years of mobile app complaints that never seem to get addressed. It's no surprise that many teams are looking for Coda alternatives.

This guide covers the best Coda alternatives in 2026, with a breakdown of what each tool does well, where it struggles, and what you'll actually end up paying.

Top Coda Alternatives at a Glance

Tool	Best For	Starting Price (Annual)	Free Plan
Glitter AI	Visual documentation & SOPs	$16/user/month	Yes (10 guides)
Notion	Knowledge management & wikis	$10/user/month	Yes (100-row DB limit)
Airtable	Database-first workflows	$20/user/month	Yes (1,000 records/base)
ClickUp	Project management & tasks	$7/user/month	Yes (unlimited users)
Monday.com	Visual work management	$9/seat/month (min 3)	Yes (2 users max)
Smartsheet	Spreadsheet-based PM	$9/user/month	30-day trial only

Why Look for Coda Alternatives?

Coda handles a lot of different tasks. The platform's "Lego-like" flexibility for combining documents, databases, and automation is genuinely impressive. The "Maker Billing" model can work out cheaper for teams with lots of viewers and few creators. The Packs ecosystem pulls live data from tools like Jira and Salesforce right into your documents, and the AI integration goes beyond basic text generation.

But all that flexibility comes with real trade-offs. Here's what typically drives teams to explore other options:

"I really really wanted to love CODA, but the delays are essentially making it unusable for me... I was in a meeting trying to take notes in CODA and the screen would just lag for a good couple of seconds."

"I love Coda, but in the last two months, the number of bugs has increased exponentially... Working with Coda has become unpredictable lately."

1. Steep Learning Curve

Coda's flexibility comes at a cost. The platform seems designed with technical users in mind. Formulas get as complex as anything you'd find in a spreadsheet, and automation options require a real time investment to learn. Non-technical team members often get confused by basics, like the difference between "tables" and "views." Some teams report spending weeks just to figure out basic workflows, which isn't ideal when there's actual work to do.

2. Performance Issues

Large Coda documents slow down noticeably. Add enough tables, cross-references, and automations, and load times start to creep up. Users report typing lag that takes "a good couple of seconds" before keystrokes register, which makes taking notes in meetings frustrating. Documents with thousands of rows can experience serious performance problems. The mobile experience is particularly rough: crashes, limited functionality, and lag that makes the app feel basically unusable.

3. Document Size Limits

The free tier's size restrictions can catch you off guard. Exceed them, and Coda locks your documents completely until you upgrade. There's no warning, no grace period. You just hit a wall, and plenty of teams don't see it coming.

4. Pricing Model Confusion

Coda's "Doc Maker" pricing sounds smart at first: only pay for people who create documents, while editors and viewers get in free. But it gets complicated quickly. The distinction between "Maker" and "Editor" creates bottlenecks since team members need a paid Maker seat just to create a new page or duplicate a document. As more people need these basic permissions, costs add up. The jump from Pro ($10/month per Maker) to Team ($30/month per Maker) is a 3x increase, mostly for things like unlimited automations and cross-doc syncing.

"It is a massive price increase. If you want a user to be able to create a page in a doc, it will now set you back $36/mo for that one user (instead of being free)..." - Reddit User

5. Limited Offline Functionality

Coda is a cloud-based tool, so you need reliable internet. Offline support is minimal. For teams working in the field, traveling, or dealing with unreliable wifi, this can be a dealbreaker.

6. Mobile Experience

If there's one area where Coda consistently falls short, it's mobile. The complaints are persistent enough to deserve their own section. The app doesn't feel native to iOS, loads slowly, and users describe it as "essentially unusable" for editing.

User feedback paints the picture:

"The Coda mobile app is garbage... It's slow, buggy and doesn't feel 'native' to iOS."

"I spent this weekend building a simple doc for the small business I work for... only to discover that the mobile app is almost useless... I know I could offer them a better user experience with Notion."

"One of the things that leads me to believe Coda is failing is mobile is completely broken and there has been zero communication about fixing it."

Many users report building entire solutions in Coda only to realize their team can't use it effectively on mobile, forcing them to rethink everything. Viewing works okay, but editing or entering data is painful.

7. Integration and API Limitations

Coda's integration ecosystem feels thinner compared to competitors. The API has limitations that become problematic at scale, including a 10,000-row limit that can break Zapier workflows when documents grow beyond that threshold. Essential integrations like Salesforce are also locked behind the Enterprise tier, which frustrates smaller teams who need those connections but can't justify the cost.

8. Export and Data Lock-in

Getting your data out of Coda is harder than it should be. There's no native Markdown or Word export for entire workspaces. PDF exports often break formatting, cutting off wide tables. CSV exports work only for individual tables, so you have to extract each one manually. All of this makes switching platforms a time-consuming headache that keeps teams stuck even when they're frustrated.

9. Acquisition Uncertainty

Grammarly announced its acquisition of Coda in December 2024. Coda still operates as a standalone product for now, but this change raises questions about the platform's long-term direction. The fact that critical issues like the mobile app have been neglected for years makes people wonder about future priorities and whether Coda will stay an independent workspace tool or get absorbed into Grammarly's productivity suite.

1. Glitter AI - Best for Visual Documentation & SOPs

Best for: Teams creating step-by-step guides, SOPs, and visual documentation

Glitter AI takes a fundamentally different approach. Instead of trying to do everything, it focuses on one thing: turning processes into visual, easy-to-follow documentation. You won't find databases or custom apps here. What you will find is probably the fastest way to go from "doing a task" to "having a professional guide for that task."

Key Features

• AI-Powered Screen Recording: Record your screen while narrating what you're doing. Glitter AI captures clicks, hover actions, voice narration, and context, then generates step-by-step guides with screenshots and explanatory text automatically
• Video + Written Guide: One recording produces both video AND step-by-step documentation, no separate tools needed
• Video-to-Guide Conversion: Already have training videos or screen recordings? Upload them and convert to written documentation
• Multi-Language Support: Record in 99 languages on all plans
• Blur Tool: Automatically hide sensitive information in screenshots (available on any paid plan)
• Multiple Export Formats: Share via link, embed in other tools, or export to PDF, HTML, Markdown, or video
• Desktop and Browser Apps: Capture workflows wherever you work, with the desktop app available even on the free plan

Pricing

• Free: 10 guides, includes web, mobile, and desktop capture
• Pro: $16/user/month (annual) or $20/user/month (monthly) - Unlimited guides, sensitive data redaction (blur tool), advanced features
• Team: $60/month for 5 users (annual) or $75/month (monthly) - Collaboration features, additional users at $12-15/month
• Enterprise: Starts at $8K/year - SSO, custom support, transparent pricing with no haggling

Note: Glitter AI supports Chromium browsers (Chrome, Edge, Brave, Arc). Safari and Firefox aren't supported. Desktop apps are available for Mac and Windows.

Why Choose Glitter AI Over Coda

If documentation is what you actually care about, Glitter AI makes Coda look unnecessarily complicated. Where Coda requires you to structure and format everything manually, Glitter AI does the heavy lifting. Record yourself doing the task, and you get a polished guide, 11x faster than creating documentation by hand.

This approach works particularly well for:

• Employee onboarding materials
• Standard operating procedures
• Training libraries
• Capturing institutional knowledge (especially urgent when key people are leaving)
• Customer support documentation

The trade-off is obvious: no database features and no app-building capabilities. If you need those, look elsewhere. But for pure documentation focused on visual step-by-step guides, this is hard to beat.

Glitter AI also never uses your data to train AI models, so your content stays private. And unlike Coda's confusing "Maker Billing" model, the pricing is simple: pay per creator, no viewer fees for embedded guides.

2. Notion - Best for Knowledge Management

Best for: Teams building internal wikis, knowledge bases, and collaborative workspaces

Notion has become the go-to Coda alternative for teams who found Coda intimidating. It offers similar capabilities, combining documents and databases, but wraps them in a friendlier interface that doesn't take weeks to learn.

Key Features

• Flexible Databases: Table, board, calendar, gallery, and timeline views with filtering and sorting
• AI Integration: Built-in AI (GPT-4.1 and Claude 3.7) for writing, meeting summaries, and semantic search
• Template Library: Hundreds of pre-built templates for quick starts
• Collaborative Docs: Real-time editing with comments and mentions
• Web Clipper: Save articles and references directly from your browser
• API Access: Well-documented API for building custom integrations

Pricing

• Free: Unlimited pages and blocks for individuals, 10 guests, 5MB uploads, 7-day history
• Plus: $10/user/month (annual), $12/user/month (monthly) - Unlimited file uploads, 30-day history, 100 guests. Note: New Plus users can no longer purchase AI add-on
• Business: $20/user/month (annual), $24/user/month (monthly) - AI included (GPT-4 and Claude 3.7), SAML SSO, 90-day history, private teamspaces
• Enterprise: Custom pricing - SCIM provisioning, audit logs, unlimited history, dedicated CSM

Notion vs. Coda

Notion favors usability where Coda favors power. The learning curve is genuinely easier, and the interface feels more polished. With the 2025 pricing updates, Notion bundled AI into the Business tier rather than charging separately, though this basically forces users who want AI to pay $20/user/month.

That said, Notion's formula system isn't as capable as Coda's, and some automation features are missing. Power users who've gotten comfortable with Coda's advanced features may feel limited.

User feedback worth considering:

"Let's be honest: this isn't a gift - it's a ransom. Pay more to keep what you already paid for..." - CEO of Swiss Tech Company discussing Notion's 2025 pricing changes

"Notion support is making me feel like I'm losing my mind... the mobile experience is significantly inferior to the desktop app, with sync issues and slow load times." - Reddit User

Choose Notion if: You want something easier to learn with solid knowledge management features, and you don't need Coda's most advanced capabilities.

3. Airtable - Best for Database-First Workflows

Best for: Teams building custom databases, CRMs, and data-centric workflows

If databases are what attracted you to Coda, Airtable deserves a serious look. It's built around relational database concepts but presents them through a spreadsheet-like interface that feels more intuitive than Coda's table implementation.

Key Features

• Relational Databases: Link records across tables, create lookups and rollups
• Rich Field Types: Attachments, checkboxes, ratings, barcodes, and plenty more
• Multiple Views: Grid, calendar, gallery, kanban, Gantt, timeline
• Automations: Trigger actions based on record changes
• Interface Designer: Build custom views tailored to different stakeholders
• Extensive Integrations: Connect with 1,000+ apps through native integrations and Zapier
• AI Agents: AI-powered automation and data processing (500 credits/month on paid plans)

Pricing

• Free: Unlimited bases, 1,000 records per base, 5 editors, 250 AI credits/month
• Team: $20/user/month (billed annually), $24/user/month (billed monthly) - 50,000 records, 25,000 automations, Gantt view, 500 AI credits/month
• Business: $45/user/month (billed annually), $54/user/month (billed monthly) - 125,000 records, 100,000 automations, SAML SSO, admin panel
• Enterprise Scale: Custom pricing - 500,000+ records, advanced admin, audit logs

Airtable vs. Coda

Airtable commits fully to being a database tool rather than trying to do everything. This makes it stronger for data-heavy use cases but less flexible for general documentation work.

People who already think in spreadsheet terms tend to pick up Airtable faster than Coda. The interface just maps more naturally to how they work. But Airtable won't help you with long-form documents or building app-like experiences.

Choose Airtable if: Your primary need is database management, CRMs, or data-driven workflows, and document editing isn't a priority.

4. ClickUp - Best for Project Management

Best for: Teams managing projects, tasks, and workflows with comprehensive PM features

ClickUp bills itself as the "one app to replace them all." That's ambitious, but not entirely wrong. It packs serious project management features alongside docs and knowledge management. If task and project tracking are central to how you work, ClickUp probably offers more depth in those areas than Coda does.

Key Features

• Task Management: Subtasks, dependencies, custom fields, multiple assignees
• Multiple Views: List, board, calendar, Gantt, timeline, workload, map, and more
• Docs: Collaborative documents with live editing
• Goals and OKRs: Track company objectives and key results
• Time Tracking: Built-in time tracking and timesheets
• Whiteboards: Visual collaboration and brainstorming
• ClickUp Brain: AI assistant for task generation, summaries, and automation (add-on)

Pricing

• Free Forever: Unlimited tasks, 100MB storage, unlimited members
• Unlimited: $7/user/month (billed annually), $10/user/month (billed monthly) - Unlimited storage, integrations, goals, 1,000 automations/month
• Business: $12/user/month (billed annually), $19/user/month (billed monthly) - Timeline, workload management, advanced reporting
• Business Plus: $19/user/month (billed annually), $29/user/month (billed monthly) - Custom permissions, team sharing, increased limits
• Enterprise: Custom pricing - Advanced security, SSO, dedicated support

ClickUp vs. Coda

ClickUp shines at traditional project management: task dependencies, time tracking, workload views, Gantt charts. Coda doesn't focus on those areas as heavily. On the other hand, ClickUp's database and formula capabilities aren't as sophisticated.

One thing to keep in mind: ClickUp has its own learning curve. The sheer number of features and customization options can overwhelm new users. It's a different kind of complexity than Coda, but complexity all the same.

Choose ClickUp if: Task tracking, dependencies, and time management are central to what your team does, and you want those features alongside documentation.

5. Monday.com - Best for Visual Work Management

Best for: Teams wanting visual, color-coded workflow management with collaboration features

Monday.com leans hard into visual design. Colorful boards, intuitive drag-and-drop, plenty of eye candy. If your team responds well to visual organization and clear status indicators, Monday.com makes work feel more approachable.

Key Features

• Visual Boards: Color-coded status columns, timeline views, Gantt charts
• 200+ Templates: Pre-built templates covering various industries and use cases
• Automations: No-code automation builder with 250K+ actions on Enterprise
• Integrations: 200+ app integrations including Google Drive, Slack, Salesforce
• Dashboards: Combine data from multiple boards for high-level views
• Multiple Products: Work Management, CRM, Dev, and Service offerings

Pricing

• Free: 2 team members max, basic features, 7-day activity log
• Basic: $9/seat/month (billed annually, min 3 seats), $12/seat/month (billed monthly) - Unlimited viewers, unlimited docs
• Standard: $12/seat/month (billed annually), $14/seat/month (billed monthly) - 250 automations, timeline and calendar views
• Pro: $19/seat/month (billed annually), $24/seat/month (billed monthly) - Private boards, time tracking, formulas, dependency columns
• Enterprise: Custom pricing - 250K actions/month, enterprise analytics, multi-board dashboards

Monday.com vs. Coda

Monday.com trades Coda's power-user features for accessibility. It's easier to pick up and looks better out of the box. The pricing is higher, though, and you won't get the same flexibility for building truly custom workflows.

Where Coda expects you to build your own solutions, Monday.com gives you templates and visual tools that work immediately. Different approaches, different strengths.

Choose Monday.com if: Your team responds well to visual organization, you want quick setup with templates, and your budget allows for a more premium solution.

6. Smartsheet - Best for Spreadsheet Power Users

Best for: Teams comfortable with spreadsheets wanting enhanced project management features

Smartsheet sits in the space between traditional spreadsheets and modern PM tools. If your team already thinks in rows and columns but needs better collaboration and project tracking, Smartsheet might click right away.

Key Features

• Spreadsheet Interface: Familiar grid view enhanced with PM capabilities
• Project Management: Gantt charts, dependencies, critical path, baselines
• Resource Management: Team workload tracking and capacity planning
• Automated Workflows: Approval requests, alerts, and status updates
• Forms: Collect data directly into sheets
• Dashboards: Real-time visual dashboards and reports
• Enterprise Integrations: Microsoft 365, Teams, Slack, Salesforce

Pricing

• Pro: $9/user/month (billed annually), $11/user/month (billed monthly) - 10 members max, 250 automations, 20GB storage
• Business: $19/user/month (billed annually, min 3 seats), $23/user/month (billed monthly) - Unlimited members, timeline view
• Enterprise: Custom pricing - AI formulas, unlimited storage, SAML SSO

Worth noting: Smartsheet dropped its free plan in 2025 and now only offers a 30-day trial.

Smartsheet vs. Coda

Smartsheet sticks closer to traditional spreadsheet paradigms. Excel users and Google Sheets veterans feel at home quickly. This makes adoption easier but limits what you can build compared to Coda's more ambitious app-like features.

Smartsheet does well at project management and resource planning, areas Coda doesn't emphasize. But it lacks Coda's document editing depth and general-purpose flexibility.

Choose Smartsheet if: Your team already lives in spreadsheets and wants enhanced PM features without abandoning the familiar grid-based approach.

Feature Comparison Table

Feature	Glitter AI	Notion	Airtable	ClickUp	Monday.com	Smartsheet
Documentation	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐
Databases	⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐
Project Management	⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Ease of Use	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐
AI Features	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐
Automations	⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐
Mobile App	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐
Integrations	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐
Free Plan	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐	⭐
Value for Money	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐	⭐⭐⭐

Pricing Comparison

Tool	Free Plan	Starter Paid (Annual)	Mid-Tier (Annual)	Enterprise
Coda	Yes (limited size)	$10/maker/month	$30/maker/month	Custom
Glitter AI	10 guides	$16/user/month	$60/mo for 5 users	$8K/year
Notion	Yes (7-day history)	$10/user/month	$20/user/month (includes AI)	Custom
Airtable	1,000 records	$20/user/month	$45/user/month	Custom
ClickUp	Unlimited users	$7/user/month	$12/user/month	Custom
Monday.com	2 users only	$9/seat/month (min 3)	$19/seat/month	Custom
Smartsheet	30-day trial	$9/user/month	$19/user/month (min 3)	Custom

All prices are annual billing. Monthly billing typically adds 15-25% to pricing.

How to Choose the Right Coda Alternative

The best Coda alternative depends on what problem you're actually trying to solve. Here's a quick framework:

Choose Glitter AI if:

• Documentation, SOPs, or training materials are your main focus
• You want the fastest path from doing something to having a shareable guide for it, 11x faster than manual documentation
• You need both video AND written documentation from a single recording
• Database and project management features aren't on your radar
• You need team members creating docs without extensive training
• Privacy matters, Glitter AI never uses your data to train AI models

Choose Notion if:

• You're building a knowledge base, wiki, or team workspace
• Coda felt too complex and you want something more approachable
• Design and polish matter to your team
• AI-powered writing and search would help

Choose Airtable if:

• Databases are the point, not documents
• You're building CRMs, content calendars, or workflows around data
• Relational database features are critical
• You rely heavily on integrations and automation

Choose ClickUp if:

• Project and task management sit at the center of your work
• You need time tracking, dependencies, and Gantt views
• You want extensive customization (and are willing to invest time learning it)
• All-in-one appeals to you despite some complexity

Choose Monday.com if:

• Visual, color-coded boards resonate with how your team thinks
• You want quick setup with pre-built templates
• Ease of use matters more than deep customization
• Budget allows for a premium tool

Choose Smartsheet if:

• Your team already works comfortably in spreadsheets
• You need classic PM features like Gantt charts and baselines
• Your industry traditionally relies on spreadsheet workflows
• Resource management and capacity planning are important

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Notion better than Coda?

It depends on what you need. Notion wins on ease of use, visual design, and general knowledge management. The learning curve is noticeably easier. But Coda has more powerful formulas, deeper automation, and better app-building features. If you regularly use those advanced features and they're important to your workflow, Coda may still be the better choice.

What's the main difference between Coda and Airtable?

Coda starts with documents and adds database features. Airtable starts with databases and adds minimal document features. Coda wants you to build interactive docs that feel like apps. Airtable wants you to manage relational data with spreadsheet familiarity. Pick based on whether your work centers on documentation or data management.

Can I import my Coda docs to another tool?

Direct import is rare, and this is a real pain point. Coda doesn't offer native Markdown or Word export for entire workspaces. You'll typically need to export tables individually as CSV files and manually copy/paste document content, then rebuild structures in your new tool. PDF exports often break formatting, especially for wide tables. Plan for a significant transition period. Running both tools in parallel for a few weeks can help, but expect manual work.

Which Coda alternative has the best free plan?

ClickUp offers the most generous free tier with unlimited users and tasks, though storage is limited. Notion's free plan works well for individuals (teams hit block limits quickly). Airtable gives you 1,000 records per base for free, which handles small projects. Glitter AI's free plan includes 10 guides with full platform access including web, mobile, and desktop capture, more generous than competitors who lock desktop recording behind paid plans.

Do these alternatives work offline like Coda?

Most are cloud-first with limited offline support, similar to Coda. Notion offers some offline access for pages you've already loaded. ClickUp and Monday.com have comparable limitations. If offline work is essential, desktop applications with better local support exist, but real-time cloud collaboration is where most of these tools focus their energy.

How do I convince my team to switch from Coda?

Start with the specific pain points your team already experiences. If people complain about complexity, demo how Notion or Monday.com is simpler. If performance issues frustrate everyone, show how alternatives handle larger datasets. Run a pilot project with volunteers rather than forcing a complete migration. Getting team members involved in evaluating options helps with adoption.

Can I use multiple tools together instead of Coda?

Plenty of teams do exactly this. Glitter AI for documentation, Airtable for databases, ClickUp for project management. There's overhead in managing multiple platforms, but you get purpose-built tools for each need rather than compromises in an all-in-one package. Whether the trade-off makes sense depends on your team's tolerance for switching between tools.

What about Coda's security and compliance features?

Coda offers SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, and CCPA compliance across all plans. Data is encrypted in transit (TLS 1.2+) and at rest (AES-256). But critical enterprise security features come with significant restrictions: SAML SSO is available only on the Enterprise plan (custom pricing), and HIPAA compliance is also Enterprise-only. Coda does not use customer data to train their AI models. Mid-sized companies needing these security features without enterprise budgets may find this frustrating.

What does the Grammarly acquisition mean for Coda users?

Grammarly acquired Coda in December 2024. While Coda continues operating as a standalone product, this acquisition raises questions about the platform's future direction. The concern isn't just about potential feature or pricing changes, but whether Coda will maintain its own development roadmap or become part of Grammarly's broader productivity suite. Given the years of complaints about mobile app issues going unresolved, some users worry this signals deprioritization of core product improvements. If you're evaluating Coda now, consider this uncertainty as part of your decision.

Our Top Recommendation

The right Coda alternative comes down to your core use case:

For visual documentation and SOPs: Glitter AI stands alone. If capturing and sharing how work gets done is the goal, nothing else makes it this easy. Record once and get both video and written documentation, 11x faster than manual documentation. Unlike Coda's confusing "Maker Billing" model or Notion's AI bundling, Glitter AI's pricing is straightforward: $16/user/month for Pro, no hidden fees, and desktop capture available even on the free plan. Plus, Glitter AI never uses your data to train AI models.

For all-around versatility: Notion offers a good mix of usability, features, and price. Teams building knowledge bases and collaborative workspaces who found Coda overwhelming tend to land here. Just be aware of the May 2025 pricing changes that bundled AI into the $20/month Business tier.

For database power users: Airtable provides strong relational database features with an interface that doesn't require database expertise. If data management is your priority, it's worth considering.

For project management: ClickUp packs comprehensive PM features at a competitive price. Task tracking, dependencies, and time management are where it shines.

Most of these tools offer free plans or trials. Testing 2-3 options on real projects with your actual team is worth the effort. What works for one organization may frustrate another. There's no substitute for hands-on experience.

Whatever you choose, moving away from Coda doesn't have to mean giving up on productivity and collaboration. It might actually mean finding something that fits your team's workflow better.